Dystopian Contemporary Positions: Sustainable Development As A Manifest Instance Of The Epistemological Disposition
Posted by Ruth Thomas-Pellicer on January 3, 2012 |
This is the initial chapter of Ruth Thomas Pellicer’s doctoral thesis submitted (2011) at the University of Surrey (UK) under the title What ist Kultur: The Places of God In the Age of Re-Embodiments. The overall thesis conforms to a study of the philosophical elements that make up the epistemological, logocentric tradition as initiated by Socrates in ancient Greece. The elements at issue are assumed to be ecocidal. In keeping, the thesis proposes to transpose –transmute—these components so that cognitive vision towards a post-ecocidal age otherwise called the Age of Re-Embodiments is gained. This work develops a ‘philosophy of the future’ in response to Nietzsche’s call to this end. It builds extensively upon the work of Nietzsche scholars such as Heidegger, Derrida, Foucault, Deleuze, Vattimo and Plotnitsky.
This first chapter in particular deals with one of the research questions that the doctoral thesis addresses: the extent to which the official project of sustainable development –mainly as set out in Our Common Future (1987)— can steer the global polity out of the ecocidal mode of being. It is argued that, cognitively, the project at issue is conterminous with the epistemological tradition largely inaugurated by Socrates. It is on these grounds that the project of sustainable development is readily dismissed as a putative post-ecocidal candidate.
Seven points of continuity between the project of sustainable development and philosophy and science as epistēmē are identified. First, sustainable development is seen to fully endorse the anthropological slumber into which the Modern Age – the zenith of the epistemological trajectory— plunges. Similarly, sustainable development is found to project the analytic of finitude common to this Age to the environment as the latter turns into an issue of public concern. Second, the rational management with which Our Common Future is imbued is pinpointed as an intrinsic element of the logocentric sciences into which philosophy as epistēmē evolves. Third and relatedly, ecological statements that inform the report under scrutiny are identified as problematic logocentric claims to truth operative and legitimized under the ecocidal mode of being. Points four and five relate to a leading feature of philosophy and science as epistēmē –namely, the pervasiveness of binary pairs. Sustainable development replicates the Cartesian culture/nature divide by which the res cogitans –‘thinking matter’— stands over against the res extensa —‘extended matter’. Likewise, the rubric of sustainable development is conceived as conforming to an unproblematized reversal of productivity –as an extension and complementing pole of the latter, that is. Sixth, the propensity of sustainable development to take for granted a docile nature assumed as it is to be utterly controllable by Promethean Man is interpreted as an expression of restricted economy, a leading trait of the epistemological disposition. Seven, sustainable development, in its promise to render productivity clean, is severely charged with the perpetuation of the teleology of progress also ingrained in the epistemological trajectory.
Read the full chapter: Dystopian Contemporary Positions: Sustainable Development As A Manifest Instance Of The Epistemological Disposition [PDF, 2 Mb]
Tags: Age of Re-embodiments > ecocidal mode of being > epistemological tradition > sustainable development
